Flatterer in a sentence | EXAMPLE-SENTENCES

The insincere flatterer showered her with compliments to gain her favor.
Be cautious of the smooth-talking flatterer who may have ulterior motives.
The cunning flatterer always knew how to say the right things to manipulate people.
He saw through the flatterer’s words and recognized the hidden agenda.
The flatterer complimented his boss excessively in hopes of getting a promotion.
Sarah was wary of the office flatterer who seemed to praise everyone indiscriminately.
The flatterer’s words were sweet but lacked sincerity.
As a seasoned politician, he could easily identify a skilled flatterer.
The flatterer tried to win her over with extravagant compliments.
Despite the flatterer’s charm, his true intentions were transparent.
She dismissed the flatterer’s words, knowing they were driven by self-interest.
The flatterer’s compliments were so excessive that they bordered on insincerity.
The persistent flatterer continued to sing praises in the hope of gaining favor.
The flatterer’s words were like honey, sweet but lacking substance.
The flatterer strategically praised his colleagues to advance his own agenda.
The office flatterer ingratiated himself with everyone to be in the boss’s good books.
She grew suspicious of the constant flattery from the office flatterer.
The seasoned businessman was immune to the tactics of the flatterer.
The flatterer’s words were like a well-rehearsed script to win people over.
The flatterer’s charm worked on some, but others saw through the facade.
The flatterer always knew how to make others feel important.
The flatterer’s words were empty, lacking sincerity or genuine admiration.
Despite his smooth talk, the flatterer failed to deceive those with discerning minds.
The flatterer tried to manipulate the situation by appealing to people’s egos.
The office flatterer’s compliments were as predictable as they were insincere.
She grew tired of the flatterer’s constant attempts to win her favor.
The seasoned actress could easily discern a genuine compliment from the flatterer’s praise.
The flatterer’s words were a façade to mask his true intentions.
His flattery was so over-the-top that it raised suspicions about the flatterer’s motives.
The flatterer’s compliments were aimed at gaining influence rather than expressing genuine admiration.
Despite his efforts, the flatterer failed to win over those who valued authenticity.
The discerning professor was immune to the flatterer’s attempts to curry favor.
The constant flatterer was eventually seen as insincere by his peers.
The seasoned politician was adept at distinguishing between genuine praise and flattery.
The flatterer’s attempts to win her over were met with skepticism.
The office flatterer’s insincere compliments were met with eye rolls from his colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking genuine emotion.
She saw through the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate her with compliments.
The flatterer’s praise was so excessive that it bordered on absurdity.
The discerning leader was not swayed by the flatterer’s attempts to curry favor.
The flatterer’s words were like a sugar-coated pill, sweet but lacking substance.
The seasoned diplomat could easily distinguish between genuine admiration and flattery.
The flatterer’s words were designed to stroke egos rather than convey truth.
Despite the flatterer’s charm, his true intentions were transparent.
The office flatterer’s excessive compliments were met with skepticism by his colleagues.
The flatterer’s attempts to win favor with empty compliments were transparent to those around him.
The cunning flatterer tailored his compliments to appeal to people’s vanity.
The discerning CEO was unimpressed by the flatterer’s attempts to win favor.
The flatterer’s praise was so overblown that it seemed insincere.
The office flatterer’s insincere compliments were an attempt to manipulate those around him.
She grew weary of the flatterer’s constant attempts to win her approval.
The seasoned actor could easily distinguish between genuine praise and the flatterer’s words.
The flatterer’s compliments were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking spontaneity.
The office flatterer’s praise was so excessive that it became the subject of office gossip.
Despite the flatterer’s best efforts, his compliments failed to win her over.
The flatterer’s attempts to win favor with empty compliments were met with skepticism.
The discerning professor saw through the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s words lacked authenticity, raising suspicions among his peers.
The seasoned politician was immune to the flatterer’s attempts to curry favor.
The flatterer’s charm offensive fell flat when people realized it was insincere.
The office flatterer’s compliments were met with skepticism, as everyone knew his ulterior motives.
The flatterer’s praise was so exaggerated that it bordered on absurdity.
She could easily distinguish between genuine compliments and the flatterer’s empty words.
The flatterer’s compliments were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking sincerity.
The discerning leader was not swayed by the flatterer’s attempts to gain influence.
The flatterer’s words were empty, lacking genuine admiration or sincerity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise was transparent to those who knew him well.
The flatterer’s attempts to win favor were met with eye rolls from his colleagues.
The seasoned journalist was immune to the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate the narrative.
The flatterer’s words were calculated to appeal to people’s vanity rather than convey genuine admiration.
The discerning CEO saw through the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s insincere compliments were aimed at manipulating rather than expressing genuine admiration.
Despite the flatterer’s best efforts, his praise failed to win over the skeptical audience.
The flatterer’s excessive compliments were met with skepticism by those who valued authenticity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise was transparent to his discerning colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were a facade, concealing his true intentions.
She saw through the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate her with empty compliments.
The discerning professor was not swayed by the flatterer’s charm offensive.
The flatterer’s compliments were so overblown that they raised suspicions about his sincerity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise failed to win over his discerning colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were like a sugar-coated pill, lacking substance.
Despite the flatterer’s charm, his true intentions were transparent.
The office flatterer’s excessive compliments were met with eye rolls from his colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking genuine emotion.
She saw through the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate her with compliments.
The flatterer’s praise was so excessive that it bordered on absurdity.
The discerning leader was not swayed by the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s charm offensive fell flat when people realized it was insincere.
The office flatterer’s compliments were met with skepticism, as everyone knew his ulterior motives.
The flatterer’s praise was so exaggerated that it bordered on absurdity.
She could easily distinguish between genuine compliments and the flatterer’s empty words.
The flatterer’s compliments were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking sincerity.
The discerning CEO saw through the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s words were empty, lacking genuine admiration or sincerity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise was transparent to those who knew him well.
The flatterer’s attempts to win favor were met with eye rolls from his colleagues.
The seasoned journalist was immune to the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate the narrative.
The flatterer’s words were calculated to appeal to people’s vanity rather than convey genuine admiration.
The discerning leader was not swayed by the flatterer’s attempts to gain influence.
The flatterer’s insincere compliments were aimed at manipulating rather than expressing genuine admiration.
Despite the flatterer’s best efforts, his praise failed to win over the skeptical audience.
The flatterer’s excessive compliments were met with skepticism by those who valued authenticity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise was transparent to his discerning colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were a facade, concealing his true intentions.
She saw through the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate her with empty compliments.
The discerning professor was not swayed by the flatterer’s charm offensive.
The flatterer’s compliments were so overblown that they raised suspicions about his sincerity.
Despite the flatterer’s charm, his true intentions were transparent.
The office flatterer’s excessive compliments were met with eye rolls from his colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking genuine emotion.
She saw through the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate her with compliments.
The flatterer’s praise was so excessive that it bordered on absurdity.
The discerning leader was not swayed by the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s charm offensive fell flat when people realized it was insincere.
The office flatterer’s compliments were met with skepticism, as everyone knew his ulterior motives.
The flatterer’s praise was so exaggerated that it bordered on absurdity.
She could easily distinguish between genuine compliments and the flatterer’s empty words.
The flatterer’s compliments were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking sincerity.
The discerning CEO saw through the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s words were empty, lacking genuine admiration or sincerity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise was transparent to those who knew him well.
The flatterer’s attempts to win favor were met with eye rolls from his colleagues.
The seasoned journalist was immune to the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate the narrative.
The flatterer’s words were calculated to appeal to people’s vanity rather than convey genuine admiration.
The discerning leader was not swayed by the flatterer’s attempts to gain influence.
The flatterer’s insincere compliments were aimed at manipulating rather than expressing genuine admiration.
Despite the flatterer’s best efforts, his praise failed to win over the skeptical audience.
The flatterer’s excessive compliments were met with skepticism by those who valued authenticity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise was transparent to his discerning colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were a facade, concealing his true intentions.
She saw through the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate her with empty compliments.
The discerning professor was not swayed by the flatterer’s charm offensive.
The flatterer’s compliments were so overblown that they raised suspicions about his sincerity.
Despite the flatterer’s charm, his true intentions were transparent.
The office flatterer’s excessive compliments were met with eye rolls from his colleagues.
The flatterer’s words were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking genuine emotion.
She saw through the flatterer’s attempts to manipulate her with compliments.
The flatterer’s praise was so excessive that it bordered on absurdity.
The discerning leader was not swayed by the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s charm offensive fell flat when people realized it was insincere.
The office flatterer’s compliments were met with skepticism, as everyone knew his ulterior motives.
The flatterer’s praise was so exaggerated that it bordered on absurdity.
She could easily distinguish between genuine compliments and the flatterer’s empty words.
The flatterer’s compliments were like a well-rehearsed script, lacking sincerity.
The discerning CEO saw through the flatterer’s attempts to gain favor.
The flatterer’s words were empty, lacking genuine admiration or sincerity.
The office flatterer’s insincere praise was transparent to those who knew him well

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply