11
The culprit has escaped from prison.
The culprit was sent to jail.
The culprit struggled desperately to get loose.
The Police made a clever plan to catch the culprit red handed.
The culprit has been arrested.
Why are you treating me like a culprit?
Strict action should be taken against the culprit in this case.
Why are you not taking any action against the culprit?
We are trying our best to find out the real culprit.
We are waiting for an FIR to be registered against the culprit.
We will find out the true culprit at the soonest.
Protesters demand stern action against the culprit.
I wanted to find out who the real culprit was.
There is no excuse for this horrendous crime and the culprit will have to face punishment for life.
We will not spare the culprit.
Culprit should be arrested and legal action should be taken.
Free radicals are the main culprit for the formation of cancer.
Stress is the main culprit that worsens pregnancy problems.
No one on earth is born as a criminal or culprit.
High cholesterol is always a culprit for many health issues.
Greasy scalp is the main culprit behind dandruff and hair loss.
Food is always a culprit when it comes to weight mismanagement.
Pollution is often cited as the main culprit for clogged pores.
Catch the culprit.
Acidity in the foods we eat is the main culprit in damaging our teeth.
If your computer is running slowly, a possible culprit is too little RAM.
Sugar is a major culprit when it comes to weight gain.
The judge asked the applicant if he recognized the culprit.
The real culprit will be caught sooner or later.
The culprit did not speak a word in self-defense.
The culprit got off.
I know the real culprit.
He is the main culprit in the bank robbery case.
The culprit confessed that he was guilty.
The culprit surrendered to the police to save his life from the bullet shot.
The police failed to trace the culprit.
The police picked off the culprit from the crowd.
The culprit is at large these days.
Who is the real culprit ?.
The police shot the culprit dead.
They wanted to find out who the real culprit was.
The culprit was forced to do this.
You must search out who the culprit is.
The culprit confessed his guilt.
The culprit confessed that he was guilty.
He wanted to find out who the real culprit was.
The real culprit will be caught sooner or later.
The culprit is caught like a rat in a trap.
The police are still searching for the culprit of the theft.
It was difficult to determine the real culprit in the crowded room.
The detective was determined to catch the culprit behind the mysterious disappearances.
The security camera footage revealed the identity of the culprit.
The fingerprint analysis pointed to the culprit’s involvement in the crime.
The culprit left behind a trail of evidence that led the investigators to their doorstep.
The true culprit confessed to the crime during the interrogation.
The witness was unable to identify the culprit in the lineup.
The forensic expert examined the crime scene for any clues that might lead to the culprit.
The cunning culprit had covered their tracks well, making it difficult for the police to apprehend them.
The suspect denied being the culprit despite the overwhelming evidence against them.
The prosecutor presented a strong case against the alleged culprit.
The police questioned several individuals to determine who the real culprit was.
The culprit had a long history of criminal activity.
The investigation finally led to the arrest of the main culprit.
The detectives conducted a thorough search of the suspect’s residence, looking for any evidence that could link them to the crime as the culprit.
The judge declared the defendant not guilty, as there was not enough evidence to prove them as the culprit.
The culprit’s fingerprints were found all over the crime scene.
The culprit’s motive for the crime remained a mystery to the investigators.
The police were determined to bring the culprit to justice.
The culprit’s actions had a profound impact on the victim’s life.
The culprit showed no remorse for their actions.
The community was relieved when the culprit was finally apprehended.
The culprit’s confession was a major breakthrough in the case.
The culprit had a history of evading the law.
The prosecutor argued that the evidence pointed to the defendant as the true culprit.
The culprit’s alibi was proven to be false during the trial.
The victim identified the culprit in a police lineup.
The detective interviewed several witnesses to identify the culprit.
The police conducted a stakeout to catch the culprit in the act.
The culprit’s escape was short-lived as they were quickly apprehended.
The authorities were determined to find and arrest the real culprit.
The culprit’s DNA was found at the crime scene.
The culprit had a motive for committing the crime.
The police obtained a warrant to search the culprit’s property for evidence.
The culprit was known for their cunning tactics in evading capture.
The community rallied together to support the victims and bring the culprit to justice.
The investigation was hindered by the lack of cooperation from the potential culprits.
The culprit’s actions were condemned by the entire neighborhood.
The police were confident that they had enough evidence to convict the culprit.
The culprit’s whereabouts remained unknown to the authorities.
The detective followed a lead that pointed to the real culprit.
The culprit’s fingerprints matched those found at the crime scene.
The victim bravely testified against the culprit in court.
The prosecutor presented a compelling case against the alleged culprit.
The culprit’s arrest was a relief to the victims and their families.
The police were determined to put an end to the culprit’s criminal activities.
The culprit’s confession was crucial in solving the case.
The investigators conducted a thorough background check on the potential culprits.
The culprit’s actions were a clear violation of the law.
The community demanded justice for the crimes committed by the culprit.
The detective carefully examined the evidence to identify the culprit.
The culprit’s escape plan was foiled by the police.
The prosecutor argued that the defendant was the primary culprit.
The culprit’s defense attorney tried to cast doubt on the evidence against their client.
The police conducted surveillance to monitor the culprit’s movements.
The culprit’s actions had far-reaching consequences.
The investigators pursued every lead to track down the culprit.
The culprit’s criminal record was extensive.
The police received an anonymous tip about the whereabouts of the culprit.
The victim was determined to confront the culprit in court.
The culprit’s arrest brought a sense of closure to the victims.
The detective interviewed potential witnesses to identify the culprit.
The community remained on edge until the culprit was apprehended.
The prosecutor argued that the evidence pointed to the defendant as the sole culprit.
The police were relentless in their pursuit of the culprit.
The culprit’s actions were a violation of trust.
The investigator uncovered new evidence that pointed to the real culprit.
The culprit’s behavior raised suspicions among their neighbors.
The police conducted a thorough search of the suspect’s vehicle, hoping to find evidence linking them to the crime as the culprit.
The judge sentenced the culprit to a lengthy prison term.
The prosecutor built a compelling case against the alleged culprit.
The culprit’s capture was a relief to the entire community.
The police were determined to uncover the motive behind the culprit’s actions.
The detective had a hunch that the real culprit was closer than they thought.
The culprit’s alibi was dismantled during the trial.
The victim’s testimony was crucial in identifying the culprit.
The prosecutor argued that the defendant’s actions clearly indicated them as the culprit.
The police conducted an extensive background check on the potential culprits.
The culprit’s DNA was a match to the samples found at the crime scene.
The investigator followed a lead that eventually led to the culprit’s arrest.
The community came together to support the victims and ensure that the culprit faced justice.
The culprit’s capture was a significant breakthrough in the case.
The police worked tirelessly to gather enough evidence to convict the culprit.
The victim identified the culprit in a photo lineup.
The detective relied on their instincts to identify the real culprit.
The culprit’s actions had a profound impact on the victims.
The prosecutor presented a strong case against the alleged culprit.
The police were determined to bring the culprit to justice, no matter how long it took.
The culprit’s confession provided crucial details about the crime.
The authorities were confident they had apprehended the correct culprit.
The detective interviewed witnesses who could potentially identify the culprit.
The community was relieved when the culprit was finally brought to justice.
The culprit’s escape attempt was unsuccessful.
The police followed up on every lead that might lead them to the culprit.
The investigator uncovered evidence that implicated the culprit.
The culprit’s criminal history was taken into account during the trial.
The prosecutor argued that the defendant was the primary culprit.
The police maintained surveillance on the culprit’s known associates.
The culprit’s arrest was a significant step toward closure for the victims.
The detective carefully analyzed the evidence to identify the culprit.
The culprit’s escape plan was thwarted by the vigilant police.
The prosecutor built a compelling case against the alleged culprit.
The police pursued every available lead to track down the culprit.
The culprit’s actions had a lasting impact on the victims.
The community demanded justice for the crimes committed by the culprit.
The detective interviewed potential witnesses to identify the culprit.
The culprit’s capture was a relief to the entire neighborhood.
The prosecutor argued that the evidence pointed to the defendant as the primary culprit.
The police were relentless in their efforts to apprehend the culprit.
The culprit’s actions were a breach of trust.
The investigator uncovered new evidence that implicated the real culprit.
The culprit’s behavior raised suspicions among those who knew them.
The police conducted a thorough search of the suspect’s residence in hopes of finding evidence that would incriminate them as the culprit.
The judge sentenced the culprit to a lengthy prison term.
The prosecutor presented a compelling case against the alleged culprit.
The culprit’s capture brought closure to the victims and their families.
The police were determined to uncover the motive behind the culprit’s actions.
The detective had a strong suspicion that the real culprit was closer than they thought.
The culprit’s alibi fell apart during the trial.
The victim’s testimony was instrumental in identifying the culprit.
The prosecutor argued that the defendant’s actions clearly indicated them as the sole culprit.
The police conducted an extensive background check on all potential culprits.
The culprit’s DNA was a perfect match to the samples found at the crime scene.
The investigator followed a lead that eventually led to the culprit’s apprehension.
The community rallied together to support the victims and ensure that the culprit faced justice.
The culprit’s capture was a significant breakthrough in the case.
The police worked tirelessly to gather enough evidence to secure a conviction against the culprit.
The victim positively identified the culprit in a photo lineup.
The detective relied on their instincts to identify the real culprit.
The culprit’s actions had a profound impact on the victims and their families.
The prosecutor presented a compelling case against the alleged culprit.
The police were determined to bring the culprit to justice, regardless of the challenges they faced.
The culprit’s confession provided vital information about the crime.
The authorities were confident they had apprehended the correct culprit.
The detective interviewed witnesses who could potentially identify the culprit.
The community breathed a sigh of relief when the culprit was finally apprehended.
The culprit’s attempt to flee was thwarted by the vigilant police.
The police followed up on every lead that might lead them to the culprit.
The investigator uncovered evidence that directly linked the culprit to the crime.
The culprit’s criminal history was taken into account during the trial.
The prosecutor argued that the defendant was the primary culprit.
The police maintained surveillance on the culprit’s known associates.
The culprit’s arrest was a significant step toward closure for the victims and their families.
The detective carefully examined the evidence to identify the culprit.
The culprit’s escape plan was foiled by the persistent police.
The prosecutor built a strong case against the alleged culprit.
The police pursued every available lead to track down the culprit.
The culprit’s actions had a long-lasting impact on the victims and their community.
The community united to demand justice for the crimes committed by the culprit.
The culprit was sent to jeil
The culprit had forced to do crime